<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Commenti a: Lo storico articolo di Murray Rothbard su Bobby Fischer	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.andreacarancini.it/2010/04/lo-storico-articolo-di-murray-rothbard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.andreacarancini.it/2010/04/lo-storico-articolo-di-murray-rothbard/</link>
	<description>Le ragioni del revisionismo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2016 13:45:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Di: a.carancini		</title>
		<link>https://www.andreacarancini.it/2010/04/lo-storico-articolo-di-murray-rothbard/#comment-1009</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a.carancini]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.andreacarancini.it/2010/04/lo-storico-articolo-di-murray-rothbard/#comment-1009</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[non si preoccupi, qualcun&#039;altro lo capirà sicuramente.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>non si preoccupi, qualcun&#39;altro lo capirà sicuramente.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Di: Anonimo		</title>
		<link>https://www.andreacarancini.it/2010/04/lo-storico-articolo-di-murray-rothbard/#comment-1008</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonimo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.andreacarancini.it/2010/04/lo-storico-articolo-di-murray-rothbard/#comment-1008</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Non ho capito perchè questo articolo dovrebbe considerarsi come se fosse attuale.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non ho capito perchè questo articolo dovrebbe considerarsi come se fosse attuale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
